- Cediranib (AstraZeneca) Boosts Survival in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Roxanne Nelson, September 30, 2013

AMSTERDAM — The investigational agent cediranib (AstraZeneca) can extend survival in women with recurrent ovarian cancer, according to a new study.
When given concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy, there was an approximate 30% improvement in progression-free survival. Cediranib continued as maintenance therapy significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival.
"These are 'ground-breaking' data," said lead author Jonathan Ledermann, MD, professor of medical oncology at the UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, United Kingdom. "This is the first trial to demonstrate a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with an oral VEGF [vascular endothelial growth-factor receptor] tyrosine kinase inhibitor in ovarian cancer."
"This suggests that cediranib has a clinically meaningful role in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer," said Dr. Ledermann.
Cornelis van de Velde, MD, PhD, professor of surgical oncology at the Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands, noted that these are important results for women with recurrent ovarian cancer.
"Once the disease has recurred, there are few treatment options available that make a significant difference to its progression and to overall survival," said Dr. van de Velde, who is president of the European CanCer Organisation, in a statement.
In previous ovarian cancer trials, survival has improved with the sequential use of drugs, he explained. Most of the recent positive trials have shown an improvement in progression-free survival, but only a few have shown an improvement in overall survival.
Dr. Jonathan Ledermann
Dr. Ledermann presented results from the ICON6 study during a presidential session here at the European Cancer Congress 2013. Cediranib showed an incremental improvement in progression-free survival and in overall survival, he reported.
"Cediranib plus platinum based chemotherapy followed by maintenance cediranib has a statistically significant benefit over chemotherapy alone," he explained during a press briefing. "In ovarian cancer, it prolonged progression-free survival by 3.2 months and overall survival by 2.7 months."
He noted that even though the average improvement in overall survival was 2.7 months, some patients will see a much more substantial benefit.
Complex Analysis
Cediranib is a potent oral inhibitor of all 3 VEGF tyrosine kinases (VEGF-1, 2, 3), and thus blocks VEGF signaling, angiogenesis, and tumor cell growth.
Dr. Ledermann explained that cediranib has previously been shown to be active in a number of tumor types and as a single agent in ovarian cancer.
However, results from a phase 3 clinical trial of metastatic colorectal cancer indicated that cediranib is inferior to bevacizumab ( Avastin), and results from a phase 3 glioblastoma trial were disappointing.
Study Details
ICON6 is an international randomized controlled trial that involved 456 patients from 63 centers. All patients were in their first relapse after chemotherapy and surgery. "We know that if they relapse more than 6 months after completion of their first line of therapy, they will often respond very well to platinum-based chemotherapy," Dr. Ledermann told journalists.
All study participants were being treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, which consisted of platinum/paclitaxel, carboplatin/cisplatin alone, or platinum/gemcitabine for up to 6 cycles.
They were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups (2:3:3). In the reference group, the women received placebo; in the concurrent group, the women received cediranib 20 mg/d during chemotherapy and then placebo for up to 18 months; in the maintenance group, the women received cediranib 20 mg/d followed by maintenance cediranib.
The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, toxicity, and quality of life.
Dr. Ledermann explained that "because the hazards were not proportional, we actually did a restricted means [RM] analysis, which is a slightly more complicated way of looking at the difference between the 2 curves, but this too showed an improvement of over 2 months."
When the researchers compared reference and maintenance therapy, the hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival was 0.57 (log-rank test P = .00001).
On RM analysis, the estimated increased time to progression was 3.2 months (from 9.4 to 12.6 months) during the 2-year follow-up period. The increase in overall survival was 2.7 months (from 17.6 to 20.3 months) (HR, 0.70; log-rank test P = .0419).
When the researchers compared reference and concurrent therapy, RM analysis showed that progression-free survival increased 2.0 months (from 9.4 to 11.4 months) (HR, 0.68; log-rank test P = .0022).
Tolerable Toxicity
Adverse events that were significantly more common in the maintenance group were hypertension, diarrhea, hypothyroidism, hoarseness, hemorrhage, proteinuria, and fatigue.
"Side effects were mostly controllable, either with dose reductions or interruptions in therapy, although some patients did need to come off treatment early because of toxicity," said Dr. Ledermann. However, adding cediranib to the treatment regimen did not compromise the chemotherapy, and most patients (>80%) were able to complete 6 cycles, he noted. In addition, most patients continued the maintenance phase until progression.
"I think this study is clinically meaningful," said briefing moderator Cora Sternberg, MD, chief of the Department of Medical Oncology and chair of the division of medical oncology at the San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals in Rome.
Cediranib "is different from bevacizumab and has a different mechanism of action," Dr. Sternberg explained. "Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also not purely VEGF inhibitors; they have other activity."
A patient could, therefore, become resistant to bevacizumab, which is a monoclonal antibody, and then respond to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor like cediranib, which has several different mechanisms of action. "I can actually see them used one after the other," she said.
The study was supported by the Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK.
European Cancer Congress 2013 (ECCO-ESMO-ESTRO): Abstract LBA 10. Presented September 30, 2013.

- Silva Mind Body Healing Seminar

foto van Silva Methode Nederland.

Fantastisch inspirerend Silva-weekend in Rotterdam gehad met Dr. Laszlo Domjan.
In 2011 heb ik na mijn diagnose elke avond de alfa-oefeningen uit het onderstaande boek gedaan (dank je wel Claire voor deze tip!) en in januari 2012 heb ik deelgenomen aan de Silva Basis cursus.
Ja, het is echt mogelijk om jezelf en anderen met mentale kracht te genezen...
Ook dit weekend weer bijna ongelofelijke bewijzen gezien. Heeft het mij in 2011 geholpen? Ja! En daarom ben ik zo blij dat ik nu nog verfijndere technieken kan toepassen dankzij de Hongaarse arts en zeer ervaren Silva-trainer Dr. Laszlo Domjan uit Hongarije.



Dr. Laszlo Domjan werkt al sinds 1977 als arts en heeft vooral veel ervaring op het gebied van chronische ziekten. Sedert 1989 is hij tevens een zeer bevlogen Silva-trainer. Sindsdien leert hij mensen met gezondheidsklachten de inspanning van dokters met hun innerlijke geneeskracht te versterken. Hij heeft over de jaren diverse onderzoeken gedaan naar het effect van het bewustzijn op het lichaam. Hij geeft een wetenschappelijke verklaring voor de Silva Ultra Technieken en geeft talloze voorbeelden die het effect van de methode bewijzen.



Dr. Laszlo Domjan is al diverse keren door Silva International onderscheiden met prijzen en eervolle vermeldingen.
Voor meer informatie o.a.: www.silva.nl en http://ultramind.ws/
Aanrader om eens een gratis voorlichtingsbijeenkomst bij te wonen.

- Dose-dense carboplatin/paclitaxel may become new standard for ovarian cancer

http://www.healio.com/hematology-oncology/gynecologic-cancer/news/online/%7B6bf6df5e-0118-42b9-a163-25a7f6d31e4a%7D/dose-dense-carboplatinpaclitaxel-may-become-new-standard-for-ovarian-cancer

:

Katsumata N. Lancet Oncol. 2013;doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70363-2.

  • August 28, 2013
A dose-dense carboplatin plus paclitaxel treatment regimen may offer a new standard of care for first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, according to long-term follow-up data from the JGOG 3016 trial.
The investigators called for additional research to better identify the best dose, schedule and route of treatment administration.
The JGOG 3016 trial included 631 patients with stage II to IV ovarian cancer treated at 85 centers in Japan.
Researchers randomly assigned 319 patients to conventional treatment with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 mg/mL per minute and paclitaxel 180 mg/m2 on day 1). The other 312 patients received a dose-dense treatment with carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL per minute on day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15.
Previously reported results from the primary analysis of the JGOG 3016 trial suggested the dose-dense regimen was associated with significant improvements in PFS and OS among women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.
For the long-term analysis, median follow-up was 76.8 months.
Data indicated that median PFS was significantly longer among patients assigned to the dose-dense regimen (28.2 months vs. 17.5 months; HR=0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91). Women assigned to the dose-dense regimen also experienced significantly longer OS (100.5 months vs. 62.2 months; HR=0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99).
“Several confirmatory trials using the dose-dense regimen with or without bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) are now ongoing in Europe and the United States,” the researchers wrote. “If these studies confirm the results of JGOG 3016, then it is likely that dose-dense chemotherapy will become an internationally accepted standard of care.”
Disclosure: This study was funded by the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group and Bristol-Myers Squibb. The researchers report honoraria and grant funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Nippon Kayaku.

- Nieuwe methode opsporen eierstokkanker veelbelovend

Screening op eierstokkanker is wellicht toch zinvol. Amerikaanse artsen zijn er voor het eerst in geslaagd de ziekte betrouwbaar in een vroeg stadium op te sporen.

De onderzoekers traceerden de eierstokkanker via een nieuw computermodel en de biomarker CA-125. Uit een groep van vierduizend vrouwen opereerden de artsen er tien wegens verdenking van kanker. In vier gevallen bleek inderdaad sprake van eierstokkanker in een vroeg stadium. De andere patiënten hadden goedaardige tumoren.

Voorspellende waarde

'Twee tot drie operaties om één geval van eierstokkanker te ontdekken, dat is een zeer acceptabele voorspellende waarde', reageert de Nijmeegse hoogleraar Gynaecologische oncologie Leon Massuger in de Volkskrant. Hij noemt de in Cancer gepubliceerde onderzoeksresultaten 'zeer interessant'.

Geen controlegroep

Voor veranderingen in de praktijk is het Amerikaanse onderzoek echter nog onvoldoende, denkt de hoogleraar, want er ontbreekt een controlegroep. 'Het is goed mogelijk dat ze zonder screening enkele maanden later waren opgespoord en dan dezelfde overlevingskans zouden hebben gehad', nuanceert Massuger.

Grootschalig onderzoek

Ook Ate van der Zee, hoogleraar Oncologische gynaecologie te Groningen, denkt dat uitvoeriger  onderzoek nodig is. Hij blikt vooruit op de resultaten van een grootschalig Brits onderzoek onder zo'n 200.000 vrouwen. Die worden over twee jaar verwacht.
Bron: Volkskrant
=======

Onderzoekers hebben een nieuwe methode ontwikkeld om eierstokkanker vroegtijdig op te sporen. De eerste resultaten van deze methode zien er veelbelovend uit.

Foto:  Thinkstock
In de studie van de Universiteit van Texas werden meer dan 4000 vrouwen over een periode van elf jaar bestudeerd. De vrouwen ondergingen jaarlijks een bloedonderzoek en de onderzoekers noteerden de niveaus van het eiwit CA-125.
Wetenschappers weten inmiddels dat het niveau van dit eiwit vaak hoger is bij mensen met eierstokkanker. Maar dit resultaat is volgens hen niet betrouwbaar te noemen.
Op basis van de echoresultaten ondergingen tien vrouwen een operatie tijdens de studieperiode. Vier vrouwen bleken eierstokkanker in een vroeg stadium te hebben. Vijf anderen hadden ovariële tumoren, die goedaardig waren. Eén vrouw had baarmoederkanker.
Twee vrouwen in de studie bleken ovariële tumoren te hebben die niet werden opgespoord door de test. "Maar dit waren geen agressieve tumoren", aldus de onderzoekers.
 
Screeningtest
Momenteel zijn er geen betrouwbare screeningtests die eierstokkanker in een vroeg stadium kunnen opsporen.
Bij vrouwen waar eierstokkanker in een vroeg stadium wordt ontdekt, is de overlevingskans gemiddeld 90 procent. Wordt de kanker in een later stadium ontdekt, dan is de overlevingskans vaak een stuk lager, gemiddeld minder dan 30 procent.
Vrouwen met eierstokkanker hebben in het begin van de ziekte meestal geen klachten, waardoor de ziekte vaak pas in een laat stadium wordt ontdekt.
Eerdere onderzoeken hebben gekeken of het meten van het CA-125 niveau in het bloed een effectieve manier is het voor het opsporen van eierstokkanker. Maar te vaak is aangetoond dat deze test niet gevoelig genoeg is om alle gevallen op te sporen.
 
Grootschalig onderzoek

De onderzoekers wachten nu op de resultaten van een grootschalige studie die momenteel in het Verenigd Koninkrijk wordt uitgevoerd met dezelfde screeningstrategie. De resultaten zullen in 2015 worden vrijgegeven.
Sarah Blagden, van the Ovarian Cancer Action research centre zegt: "In vergelijking met de studie die momenteel nog in het Verenigd Koninkrijk wordt uitgevoerd, is dit een kleine studie. Maar met deze studie wordt wel aangetoond dat effectieve ovariële screening mogelijk is".
Bron: NU.nl

- Samenwerking Curie-Cancer en Sanofi naar eierstokkanker

http://www.oncologieenpraktijk.nl/nieuws/laatste_nieuws/samenwerking_curie_cancer_en_sanofi_naar_eierstokkanker

Sanofi en Curie-Cancer, kondigden op 19 juni 2013 een driejarige samenwerking aan voor onderzoek naar nieuwe behandelingen van eierstokkanker.

Het doel van de samenwerking is om opnieuw te kijken naar de basale biologie van dit type kanker. Het Curie Instituut heeft een grote collectie ingevroren tumorweefsels. Daarvan worden de biologische ‘targets’ (aangrijpingspunten) onderzocht die relevant zijn voor de effectieve behandeling van bepaalde vormen van kanker.

De kennis die oncologen en biologen van Curie-Cancer gedurende vele jaren over eierstokkanker hebben opgebouwd, wordt gecombineerd met de expertise van wetenschappers van de onderzoeks- en productontwikkelingteams van Sanofi. Door deze samenwerking verwachten Sanofi en Curie-Cancer beter inzicht te krijgen in de moleculaire veranderingen die veel soorten eierstokkanker karakteriseren, waardoor het mogelijk wordt om nieuwe werkzame geneesmiddelen te ontwerpen.

Eierstokkanker is nog steeds moeilijk te behandelen, ondanks recente vooruitgang. De belangrijkste risicofactor is de leeftijd, naast een erfelijke factor in 5-10% van de gevallen. De ziekte wordt heel vaak pas laat gediagnosticeerd. De huidige therapeutische strategie van het combineren van chirurgie en chemotherapie is effectief, maar recidieven zijn frequent en het lichaam wordt geleidelijk immuun voor medische behandeling.

Meer informatie

  • Persbericht Sanofi 19 juni 2013
  • Oncologisch onderzoek Sanofi
  • Oncologie en Praktijk, onderzoek

    Sanofi Media Relations Investor Relations
    Frédéric Lemonde-San Sébastien Martel
    Tél. : + (33) 1 53 77 91 55 Tél. : + (33) 1 53 77 45 45
    frederic.lemonde@sanofi.com ir@sanofi.com

    Lauren Musto
    Oncology Division Communications
    Tel: 1 (617) 768-1993; Mobile 1(781) 572-1147
    lauren.musto@sanofi.com

    Curie-Cancer Médias et analystes
    Damien Salauze Andrew Lloyd & Associates
    damien.salauze@curie.fr Juliette dos Santos / Céline Gonzalez
    Tél. : +(33) 1 56 54 07 07
    juliette@ala.com / celine@ala.com

- Jaaa... ik ben er nog hoor!

Te lang niet geschreven, wel voluit geleefd!
Het gaat goed, gisteren terug gekomen van een mooie Zingen voor je Leven in Frankrijk-week.
Foto's volgen.
Nu op naar de controle van 6 juni in het AVL.
God geve dat de uitslag weer goed is...
Ik zie dat mijn blog nog steeds wordt gelezen.
Zijn er specifieke vragen, laat het me weten, in een reactie of via de mail: info@mentortouch.nl
Gaarne bereid deze -waar mogelijk- te beantwoorden.
Tot later! Groet Daphne

JAAAA, WEER IS DE UITSLAG GOED !!! (CA125 wel gestegen van <6 naar 8, maar dat is te verwaarlozen toch?)

- Leren leven als een elastiekje

Wat een prachtig en indrukwekkend boek van deze jonge vrouw. Gediagnosticeerd met baarmoederhalskanker in de terminale fase en ten dode opgeschreven door het medisch circuit, is zij nu vrij van kanker dankzij de weg die zij zelf volgde.
Dank lieve ML voor deze tip!

- Operatie bij endometriose verlaagt risico op eierstokkanker

Vrouwen die een chirurgische behandeling ondergaan voor endometriose hebben een lagere kans op eierstokkanker, dan de vrouwen die dit niet doen.
Foto: ANP
Dat stellen onderzoekers in het Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, een tijdschrift van de Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Eerder onderzoek liet een verhoogd risico zien op verschillende kankers waaronder eierstokkanker, bij vrouwen met endometriose.
"Vrouwen met endometriose worden vaak behandeld met hormonen of een operatie", legt onderzoeker Anna-Sofia Melin van het Karolinska Instituut uit. "We wilden kijken of het type behandeling invloed heeft op het kankerrisico."
Zweden
De onderzoekers maakten gebruik van het Zweedse nationale patiëntenregister en bestudeerden de gegevens van alle vrouwen die de diagnose endometriose kregen in de periode 1969 tot 2007.
In totaal hadden ze van 220 vrouwen met endometriose die eierstokkanker ontwikkelden alle gegevens, 416 vrouwen met endometriose golden als controlegroep.
ResultatenDe resultaten wijzen op een verband tussen het chirurgisch verwijderen van een eierstok en het risico op eierstokkanker. Daarnaast vonden de onderzoeker ook een verband tussen de kanker en het verwijderen van alle zichtbare endometriose.
"Die operatie lijkt vrouwen met endometriose dus te beschermen tegen eierstokkanker", aldus Melin. "De rol van een hormonale behandeling bij vrouwen met endometriose blijft onduidelijk en vervolgonderzoek is nodig."
Door: Gezondheidsnet
Bron: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-04/w-etl040913.php

Endometriosis treatments lower ovarian cancer risk

A novel study shows women who undergo surgical treatment for endometriosis have a lower risk of developing ovarian cancer. According to results published in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, a journal of the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology, hormonal treatments for endometriosis did not lower ovarian cancer risk.
Endometriosis is a common, and often painful, gynecological disease where tissue normally found inside the uterus, grows elsewhere in the body. According to the World Health Organization this estrogen-dependent disease affects roughly 14% of women of childbearing age. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) estimates that more than 5.5 million women in North America have endometriosis, and if left untreated can cause infertility in up to 40% of women who are unable to conceive.
Prior research shows an increased risk of several cancers, including ovarian cancer, in women with endometriosis. Some studies have found a protective effect against ovarian cancer with surgical interventions, such as hysterectomy or tubal ligation. Lead author, Dr. Anna-Sofia Melin from the Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden explains, "Patients with endometriosis are typically treated with hormones, or in more severe cases, with surgery. We wanted to expand understanding of ovarian cancer risk in women with endometriosis who had some type of surgery or hormone therapy."
Using the National Swedish Patient Register, the team identified women diagnosed with endometriosis between 1969 and 2007. The National Swedish Cancer Register was then used to link women who were diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer at least one year following a diagnosis of endometriosis. Information on hormonal and surgical treatments was taken from medical records of the 220 women with endometriosis and ovarian cancer (cases) and 416 women with endometriosis only (controls).
Findings indicate a significant association between the surgical removal of an ovary (oophorectomy) and ovarian cancer risk. A significant link between ovarian cancer risk and radical removal of all visible endometriosis was also found. "Our study suggests that surgical removal of an ovary and removal of visible endometriosis protects women from developing ovarian cancer at a later point," concludes Dr. Melin. "For women with endometriosis, the role of hormonal treatment and future ovarian cancer risk remains unclear and further investigation is warranted."
###
This study is published in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Media wishing to receive a PDF of the article may contact sciencenewsroom@wiley.com.
Full citation: Hormonal and Surgical Treatments for Endometriosis and Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer." Anna-Sofia Melin, Cecilia Lundholm, Ninoa Malki, Marja-Liisa Swahn, Par Sparen and Agneta Bergqvist. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica; Published online: April 11, 2013 (DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12123)
Author Contact: To arrange an interview with Dr. Melin, please contact Katarina Sternudd with Karolinska Institute at Katarina.sternudd@ki.se.
About the Journal:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is the official scientific journal of the Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). It is a clinically oriented journal that covers all aspects of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive health, including perinatology, gynecologic endocrinology, female urology and gynecologic oncology. The journal is published in English and includes: editors´ messages, editorials, Acta commentaries, Acta reviews and original articles under the main categories of investigation, pregnancy, birth, fertility, infection, gynecology, gynecologic urology, oncology and surgery. The journal is published by Wiley on behalf of the NFOG. For more information, please visit http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/aogs.

- Van polisvoorwaarden naar polismeerwaarden



 
Bijzondere ochtend met filmopnamen thuis over mijn (positieve) ervaringen met de Arbeidsongeschiktheidsverzekering van Zilveren Kruis Achmea en bedoeld als interne bedrijfsvoorlichting. Natuurlijk verleende ik mijn kosteloze medewerking hieraan!
De claimmanager, arbeidsdeskundige en psycholoog zijn van grote waarde geweest tijdens het immens zwarte gat na de diagnose en behandelingen. Op dit moment ben ik 50% belastbaar m.b.t. werk. Verschillende opties liggen er die ik allemaal aan een streng haalbaarheidsonderzoek onderwerp... Want mijn kwaliteit van leven, het goed voor mij zelf zorgen en mijn balans blijven mijn prioriteit. 



- Antineoplastons (PDQ)

Al eerder over gelezen: de antineoplaston-therapie ontwikkeld door Dr. S.R. Burzynski (niet goedgekeurd door FDA):

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/antineoplastons/patient/page2

What are antineoplastons?

  1. Antineoplastons are a group of chemical compounds that are found normally in urine and blood. They are made up mostly of amino acids (the building blocks of protein) and peptides (compounds made of two or more amino acids). For use in medical research, antineoplastons were originally taken from human urine, but they are now made from chemicals in the laboratory.
  2. What is the history of the discovery and use of antineoplastons as a complementary and alternative treatment for cancer?
    Antineoplaston therapy was developed by Dr. S. R. Burzynski. He proposed that there must be a process in the body that controls how a cell develops, and that this process fails when a cell divides endlessly and develops into a tumor. He suggested that certain natural substances, which he named "antineoplastons," switch an abnormal cell back onto the path of normal development. Since peptides are considered to be the carriers of instructions in the body, he began looking for peptides that may be present in the blood of cancer patients. After comparing the blood of healthy people to the blood of people with cancer, Dr. Burzynski found that people with cancer have lower amounts of a certain group of chemicals. He found these same chemicals in urine and suggested that some of these chemicals can be used to stop certain cancer cells from dividing.
    Dr. Burzynski separated and removed several different types of antineoplastons from the urine of healthy people. He tested these antineoplastons on normal and abnormal cells to see their effect and found that some types of antineoplastons were more effective on more types of abnormal cells than others. He called this type antineoplaston A. He later developed and tested antineoplastons A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5. He found that A2 had the most effect on tumor cells and named the active ingredient in it A10. Other antineoplastons followed. In 1976, Dr. Burzynski proposed the use of antineoplastons as a possible cancer treatment and began treating patients in clinical trials at his own clinic. (See Question 6.) Since 1980, Dr. Burzynski has made the antineoplastons from chemicals in his laboratory, instead of taking them from urine or blood.
  3. What is the theory behind the claim that antineoplastons are useful in treating cancer?
    According to Dr. Burzynski, when the body does not have enough antineoplastons, cells that begin to develop abnormally are not corrected, and tumors form and grow. He suggests that antineoplaston therapy supplies the body with the substances needed to correct the abnormal development of the cell and allow it to develop normally or to die a natural cell death, while healthy cells are not affected.
  4. How are antineoplastons administered?
    Antineoplastons have been given in different ways. Today, most antineoplastons are given by mouth or by injection (shot).
  5. Have any preclinical (laboratory or animal) studies been conducted using antineoplastons?
    Research in a laboratory or using animals is done to find out if a drug, procedure, or treatment is likely to be useful in humans. These preclinical studies are done before testing in humans is begun.
    Dr. Burzynski did laboratory studies to see how antineoplastons affect human cancer cells. He reported that antineoplaston A killed human cancer cells but had no effect on animal tumor cells. Other types of antineoplastons have not been tested in animals.
    Japanese scientists tested some types of antineoplastons on human liver cancer cells. High doses were needed to slow the growth of the cells or cause them to die.
    Several laboratory-made antineoplastons have been tested on various types of cells and were reported to be more effective than the natural form taken from urine.
    (See the PDQ health professional summary on Antineoplastons for more information on preclinical study results.)
  6. Have any clinical trials (research studies with people) of antineoplastons been conducted?
    To date, no phase III randomized, controlled trials of antineoplastons as a treatment for cancer have been conducted.
    Many cancer patients have been treated with antineoplastons at Dr. Burzynski's clinic and studied there. A few trials and case studies have been done outside of the clinic. Some of the cancers studied include breast, bladder, cervical, prostate, liver, and lung cancers, leukemia, lymphoma, and brain tumors.
    Published information includes results from phase I clinical trials, phase II clinical trials, and case reports. The following antineoplastons were studied in clinical trials:
    • Antineoplaston A
    • Antineoplaston A10
    • Antineoplaston AS2-1
    • Antineoplaston AS2-5
    • Antineoplaston A2
    • Antineoplaston A3
    • Antineoplaston A5
    Safety of Antineoplastons
    Phase I trials are the first step in testing a new treatment in people. In these studies, researchers test to see what dose is safe, how the treatment should be given (such as by mouth or by injection), and how often it should be given.
    In the phase I trials of antineoplastons, side effects were usually mild and did not last long.
    The most severe harmful side effects occurred in a phase II trial. Phase II cancer trials study how a treatment works against certain types of cancer and how it affects the body. A phase II trial of antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 in brain tumor patients reported severe nervous system side effects including sleepiness, confusion, seizures, and swelling near the brain.
    (See Question 7.)
    Effect of Antineoplastons on Brain Tumors, Prostate Cancer, and Liver Cancer
    Studies have reported on the effect of antineoplastons in certain types of cancer:
    • The effect of antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 on brain tumors was studied at Dr. Burzynski's clinic and at the Mayo Clinic. A brain tumor study done in Japan did not report the type of antineoplaston used.
    • The effect of antineoplaston AS2-1 on prostate cancer was studied at Dr. Burzynski's clinic.
    • The effect of antineoplaston A10 on liver cancer is discussed in a case report from Japan.
    These studies reported mixed results, including some cancer remissions (signs and symptoms of cancer decreased or went away). Other investigators have not been able to obtain the same results reported by Dr. Burzynski and his team. Some of the patients in the reported studies received standard treatments in addition to the antineoplastons. In those cases, it is not known if responses and side effects were caused by antineoplaston therapy, the other treatments, or both. One additional independent report (a study from Japan) was completed but does not have the same findings as the Burzynski report.
    (See the PDQ health professional summary on Antineoplastons for detailed information on clinical trial results.)
    Randomized controlled trials give the highest level of evidence. In these trials, volunteers are put randomly (by chance) into one of 2 or more groups that compare different treatments. One group (called the control group) does not receive the new treatment being studied. The control group is compared to the groups that receive the new treatment, to see if the new treatment works. No randomized, controlled trials showing the effectiveness of antineoplastons have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
    In 1991, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) reviewed some of Dr. Burzynski’s cases and decided to conduct clinical trials on antineoplastons at cancer centers. By August 1995, only 9 patients had enrolled and the clinical trials were closed before being completed. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave Dr. Burzynski permission to conduct clinical trials of antineoplaston therapy at his own clinic. Ongoing non-randomized clinical trials at the Burzynski clinic continue to study the effect of antineoplastons on cancer.
    The antineoplastons now used in clinical trials are A10, AS2-5, AS2-1, A2, A3, and A5. Information about ongoing clinical trials is available from the NCI Web site.
  7. Have any side effects or risks been reported from antineoplastons?
    Antineoplaston side effects included mild, short-term side effects as well as serious nervous system problems.
    The following mild side effects have been noted:
    Serious nervous system side effects included the following:
    • Extreme sleepiness.
    • Confusion.
    • Seizures.
    • Swelling near the brain.
  8. Are antineoplastons approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as a cancer treatment in the United States?
    Antineoplastons are not approved by the FDA for the prevention or treatment of any disease. In the United States, antineoplaston therapy can be obtained only in clinical trials at Dr. Burzynski’s clinic.